Static vs Kinetic Friction: When to Use Which

🧰FRQ: Sliding the Tool Chest

Assessments aligned to 2026 AP Physics 1 standards

📋Scenario

Two technicians need to reposition a 10 kg steel tool chest across a level concrete floor. They first notice it takes a hard initial shove to get the chest going, but once it is sliding it is much easier to keep it moving at a steady speed.

By experiment they establish that the chest is on the verge of sliding when the horizontal push reaches 60 N, and that a steady horizontal push of 40 N keeps it sliding at constant velocity.

Take g = 10 m/s². All motion is one-dimensional and horizontal; take the direction of motion as positive. The chest’s base stays flat on the floor.

📝Free response questions

(a) Using the two experimental observations, determine the coefficient of static friction and the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tool chest and the concrete floor. 

(b) Explain, in terms of the forces involved, why a larger push is needed to start the chest moving than to keep it moving at constant speed. Refer to the specific friction forces and coefficients in your answer. 

(c) Once the chest is sliding, the technicians increase their steady push to 70 N. Calculate the chest’s acceleration, and sketch (describe) how the friction force on the chest changes as the push is raised from 0 N up through 70 N. 

(d) A technician argues: “Since it took 60 N to get the chest moving, the friction force on the chest must be 60 N at the very start of the slide, then drop.” Evaluate this claim. State precisely what the friction force is at the instant just before sliding and at the instant just after sliding begins, and explain whether the claim is right, partly right, or wrong. 

🗝️Answer Key & Scoring Guide

Part (a) — Model Answer

On level ground N = mg = (10)(10) = 100 N. At the verge of sliding the push equals the maximum static friction; at constant velocity while sliding the push equals the kinetic friction (zero acceleration in both cases):

f_s,max = 60 N = μ_s N ⇒ μ_s = 60 / 100 = 0.60

f_k = 40 N = μ_k N ⇒ μ_k = 40 / 100 = 0.40

Result: μ_s = 0.60 and μ_k = 0.40 (both dimensionless), consistent with μ_s > μ_k.

Scoring (3 points):

✔️1 point: N = mg = 100 N.

✔️1 point: μ_s = f_s,max / N = 60/100 = 0.60 (push at impending motion = maximum static friction).

✔️1 point: μ_k = f_k / N = 40/100 = 0.40 (steady-speed push = kinetic friction, a = 0).

Part (b) — Model Answer

To start the chest the push must overcome the maximum static friction f_s,max = μ_s N = 60 N. The moment it is sliding, the opposing force becomes kinetic friction f_k = μ_k N = 40 N. Because μ_k < μ_s for this surface pair, the kinetic friction (40 N) is smaller than the maximum static friction (60 N) that had to be beaten.

So less force is needed to balance kinetic friction and keep the chest moving at constant speed than was needed to break it loose.

Scoring (2 points):

✔️1 point: identifies that starting requires beating maximum static friction μ_s N, while keeping it moving only balances kinetic friction μ_k N.

✔️1 point: attributes the difference to μ_k < μ_s (so f_k < f_s,max) for the same surfaces.

⚠️Common error: attributing the difference to mass or to “inertia being harder to start” — no credit; the cause is the coefficient difference, not a change in N or m.

Part (c) — Model Answer

While sliding, kinetic friction is constant at f_k = μ_k N = 40 N. With a 70 N push:

F_push − f_k = ma

a = (F_push − f_k) / m = (70 − 40) / 10 = 30 / 10 = 3.0 m/s²

Friction vs push as the push rises from 0 to 70 N: while the chest is stationary, static friction rises linearly to match the push exactly (friction = push), climbing from 0 up to its maximum of 60 N at the verge of sliding. The instant sliding begins, the friction force drops to the constant kinetic value of 40 N and stays at 40 N for all larger pushes (it does not keep rising with the push).

Scoring (3 points):

✔️1 point: uses f_k = 40 N (constant kinetic friction) while sliding.

✔️1 point: correct acceleration a = (70 − 40)/10 = 3.0 m/s².

✔️1 point: describes the friction–push relationship correctly: rises with push up to 60 N (static), then drops to and stays at 40 N (kinetic).

⚠️Common error: stating friction equals 70 N or keeps increasing once sliding — no credit for the description point; kinetic friction is independent of the applied push.

Part (d) — Model Answer

The claim is partly right. Just before sliding, the chest is at the verge of motion, so static friction has reached its maximum value — exactly f_s = f_s,max = μ_s N = 60 N, balancing the 60 N push. So the “60 N at the start” part is correct, but only at the single instant of impending motion.

The instant sliding actually begins, the relevant force becomes kinetic friction, which is f_k = μ_k N = 40 N — not 60 N. So friction does drop, but it drops to 40 N, and the 60 N value applies only at the boundary instant, not during the slide. The claim is therefore correct about the value at impending motion and about the drop, but wrong if it implies friction is 60 N during any part of the actual sliding.

Scoring (3 points):

✔️ 1 point: Correctly evaluates the claim as partly right (must explicitly address both the valid and invalid aspects of the technician's statement).

✔️ 1 point: States that at the instant just before sliding (impending motion), the static friction force is exactly 60 N.

✔️ 1 point: States that at the instant just after sliding begins, the friction force immediately drops to the constant kinetic friction value of 40 N.

⚠️ Common error: Agreeing with the claim completely by assuming the 60 N force persists into the slide, or failing to explicitly state the 40 N kinetic friction value that takes over once motion begins.

Sliding a Tool Chest: Static and Kinetic Friction

Sliding a Tool Chest: Static and Kinetic Friction

Normal N = mg
100 N
Max static f_s
60 N
μ_s
0.60
μ_k
0.40
Mass m = 10 kgg = 10 m/s² Normal force N = mg = 100 N
Push at verge of sliding 60 N
Steady push while sliding 40 N

Static coefficient μ_s

At the verge of sliding: a = 0, friction at its maximum
μ_s = fs,max / N = 60/100 = 0.60

Kinetic coefficient μ_k

Sliding at steady speed: a = 0, kinetic friction
μ_k = fk / N = 40/100 = 0.40
Physics Insights

Both measurements share the same trick: the chest has zero acceleration, so the push and the friction are equal in size. At the verge of sliding friction has climbed to its ceiling, fs,max, so the push that just starts motion equals the maximum static friction. While the chest slides at steady speed, kinetic friction acts, so the push that holds constant velocity equals fk.

The normal force comes from vertical balance: the floor pushes up exactly as hard as gravity pulls down, so N = mg = 100 N. Dividing each friction force by this same N gives the two coefficients, μ_s = fs,max/N and μ_k = fk/N.

Because it always takes a bigger push to start the chest than to keep it moving, μ_s > μ_k. The coefficients are pure ratios — no units — and they depend on the two surfaces, not on how hard you happen to push.

STATIONARY — static friction matches the push f = F_push ≤ 60 N
Push F
0 N
Friction f
0 N
Friction type
static
Net force
0 N
Applied push F 0 N
Physics Insights

While the chest is stationary, static friction is self-adjusting: it grows to exactly match the push, so the two arrows stay equal and the net force is zero. It can only do this up to its ceiling, the maximum static friction fs,max = μ_s N = 60 N. The chest is on the verge of sliding when the push reaches that value.

The instant the push exceeds 60 N the bonds break and the chest slides. Now the opposing force is kinetic friction f_k = μ_k N = 40 N, a fixed 40 N. To keep it moving at steady speed needs only 40 N of push, far less than the 60 N that started it.

The reason starting is harder is entirely that μ_k < μ_s (0.40 < 0.60), so f_k < f_s,max for this surface pair. It is not the mass or "inertia" — the normal force N = 100 N never changed; only which friction acts did.

Push F
0 N
Friction f
0 N
Net F
0 N
Accel a
0.0 m/s²
Speed v
0.0 m/s
Static: friction = push (rises to 60 N) Kinetic: fixed 40 N Current push
Steady push F 0 N
Physics Insights

Set the push to 70 N and start: while sliding, kinetic friction is fixed at f_k = μ_k N = 40 N, so the net force is 70 − 40 = 30 N and a = (F − f_k)/m = (70 − 40)/10 = 3.0 m/s². The chest speeds up steadily.

The graph shows the whole friction story. While the chest is stationary, static friction climbs the blue line, matching the push exactly, up to its peak of 60 N at the verge of sliding. The instant it slides, friction drops to the flat red line at 40 N and stays there for every larger push.

Kinetic friction is independent of the applied push: pushing at 70 N, 80 N, or 100 N gives the same 40 N of friction. The friction never equals the push once sliding — only the net force grows, so harder pushing means more acceleration, not more friction.

"Since it took 60 N to get the chest moving, the friction force on the chest must be 60 N at the very start of the slide, then drop."
t < t_slip Just before sliding: static friction is at its maximum, balancing the 60 N push.
Applied push
60 N
Friction now
60 N
Friction type
max static
Timeline — drag across the slip instant
t < t_slipt = t_slipt > t_slip
Partly right — the value at impending motion Just before sliding, friction really is fs,max = μ_s N = 60 N, balancing the 60 N push. And friction does drop. That much of the claim is correct.
Wrong — "60 N at the start of the slide" The instant sliding begins the force is kinetic friction, f_k = μ_k N = 40 N. Friction is never 60 N during any part of the actual slide — the 60 N applies only at the boundary instant.
Physics Insights

Two different friction forces meet at the slip boundary. Just before sliding (t < t_slip) the chest is at the verge of motion, so static friction sits at its ceiling: f = f_s,max = μ_s N = 60 N, exactly cancelling the push. The instant sliding begins (t > t_slip) the surfaces are in relative motion, so the force is kinetic friction: f = f_k = μ_k N = 40 N.

So friction jumps down from 60 N to 40 N at the boundary — a step change, because μ_k < μ_s. The claim is right that 60 N matters and right that friction drops, but wrong if it means friction is 60 N during the slide. During sliding it is 40 N.

Static and Kinetic Friction: When friction holds, when it breaks loose, and which coefficient applies

Static and Kinetic Friction: When friction holds, when it breaks loose, and which coefficient applies

FRICTION FORCE f 0.00 N STATIC (holding)
FRICTION f vs APPLIED FORCE Fₐₚₚ
μₛN 17.6 N
μₖN 13.2 N
NORMAL N 29.4 N
NET FORCE 0.00 N
ACCEL a 0.00 m/s²
VELOCITY v 0.00 m/s
APPLIED FORCE Fₐₚₚ0.0 N
μₛ — STATIC COEFF.0.60
μₖ — KINETIC COEFF.0.45
MASS m3.0 kg

PHYSICS INSIGHTS

Static friction adjusts itself. While the block is at rest, friction is whatever it needs to be to cancel the push: f = Fₐₚₚ, so a = 0. The rule fₛ ≤ μₛN is an inequality — μₛN is a ceiling, not the value. Watch both arrows grow together and the graph climb the 45° line as you raise Fₐₚₚ.

Breakaway. The instant Fₐₚₚ exceeds μₛN, the surface can no longer hold. Friction drops from μₛN to the smaller kinetic value μₖN (μₖ < μₛ), so a net force Fₐₚₚ − μₖN appears and a = (Fₐₚₚ − μₖN)/m. That sudden drop is why objects jerk into motion — it is harder to start sliding than to keep sliding.

Which coefficient applies? Check the velocity, not the push. v = 0 → static: use fₛ ≤ μₛN. Sliding → kinetic: f = μₖN exactly, independent of Fₐₚₚ. If the push falls below μₖN, the block decelerates; once v returns to 0 it re-sticks and static friction takes over again.

Static and kinetic friction.pdf
Complete and Continue  
Discussion

0 comments